Several friends have asked me for a copy of the speech I gave to the County Delegates at the County Convention on April 24, 2010. Below is a complete copy:
Hello delegates!
My name is Joel Wright. I am a candidate for Utah County Commission Seat A, and I’m here to ask for your vote!
I grew up in Provo, and am proud to have been educated by our local schools. I attended BYU, where I earned degrees in Economics and Political Science, and married my sweetheart. I then moved to NYC to attend law school. After working in NYC and Washington DC, my wife and I missed Utah County, and jumped at the chance to return to Utah County to raise our children here.
When I served on my City Council, I realized we needed more leadership at the regional level on transportation. Utah County has 550,000 people now, and we’ll have one million residents in 20 years or less. We simply must do better on transportation, and several other issues, which is why I decided to run for the Utah County Commission.
Let me tell you what I will stand for as your County Commissioner:
First, I will always tell you the truth. I have not hesitated to tell you the truth on any issue during this campaign, and I will continue to do so as your County Commissioner. I will send you a monthly email where you can respond to me, and host a web page where anyone can come and discuss the issues facing Utah County. You will almost certainly disagree with me at least once in a while, and that is when I most need and want to hear from you.
Second, you will be able to hold me accountable for how every tax dollar is spent. I know that every dollar government takes from you means you have less time to be a Scout master, or a soccer coach, or a Mother.
Third, I will always do what is right, regardless of the political consequences. At different points in my public service I have come under tremendous pressure to go along with the crowd, or keep my mouth shut. I have always refused to do so. I believe there are many things more important than myself, and I will always do what is right.
Finally, I promise to give more than I get. I love Utah County. Our ancestors made tremendous sacrifices so we could enjoy the freedom we have today. I am willing to make those same sacrifices.
Thank you so much for your service as a County Delegate. I humbly ask for your vote, and look forward to working with you to improve Utah County. Thank you!
END
Monday, May 17, 2010
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
A County Delegate dares to attend a County Commission meeting
Loved this blog post from Steven Reid on attending an actual County Commission meeting:
http://nacilbupera.blogspot.com/2010/04/utah-county-commissioner-mtng.html
TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 2010
Utah County Commissioner Mtng Attendance
This morning we attended our first ever Utah County Commissioner's Meeting. Since becoming a county delegate we figured it was our duty to go check out our elected Commissioners in action and see if things were running properly and now that the convention is over, we had a bit more time to do so.
Utah County is made up of three County Commissioners who meet Tuesday mornings at 9am. We're rather astonished that the meeting is at 9am when we like many are scheduled to work. Provo has its city council meetings at 7pm when we are more able to attend. We might be able to fathom the 9am meeting time if the meeting were rebroadcast: but there is no rebroadcast of Utah County Commissioner Meetings! We discovered the only venue currently available to citizens of the County for meeting review are agenda meeting notes posted online up to two weeks later after the meeting has taken place. In other words, the review-ability for our elected Commissioners is grossly deficient: THIS MUST BE FIXED!
At today's meeting, Commissioner Anderson was excused for health reasons and Commissioners White and Ellertson reviewed a rather non-controversial agenda approving all the items 2-0. Items of interest included Health Dept Director Miner talking about a aerial mosquito abatement program, a discussion on the Jordan River Commission to have the 18 jurisdictions split a $100K bill making the river a showcase for the state, and Richard Nance presenting the results of the clean-out-the-cabinet prescription drug reclamation of nearly 900 pounds of medication (see detailed Deseret News article).
The meeting also prompted us to chronicle the attendance of our elected officials at these meetings. Below is a spreadsheet using data extracted from the official minutes of the County Commissioner meetings for 2010 (for any corrections plz comment below or see our profile for email address):
From this data we gather the following interesting conclusions:
Our County Commissioners all have superb attendance at these meetings. This is really crucial as there are only 3 to conduct business
Joel Wright and Leon Frazier were the only two Commissioner candidates to have attended ANY Commissioner meeting in 2010. We were flabbergasted that Doug Witney had yet to attend any meeting yet was able to knock out the incumbent Steve White at Saturday's convention. We wonder if this glaring absence continues how in November either Republican Witney or Democrat Barratt are going to have any clue on what the issues are or of a smooth transition. We didn't see either at today's meeting nor was Mr. Wright present. We feel it unreasonable to expect perfect attendance during a campaign for a candidate running for County Commissioner, while we do expect some attendance.
Our elected County Officials appear to be attending as they are able. We feel that all of our elected officials should be making periodic appearances whenever available at our County Commissioner meetings. We also feel there will be times when then have pressing conflicts and should not be viewed as having to attend every meeting. Furthermore, some positions may merit more frequent attendance than others. We feel all the current elected county officials are doing due diligence.
We plan on keeping track of and periodically disclose attendance at the County Commissioner Meeting as a way of doing our patriotic part to keep check on our government.
http://nacilbupera.blogspot.com/2010/04/utah-county-commissioner-mtng.html
TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 2010
Utah County Commissioner Mtng Attendance
This morning we attended our first ever Utah County Commissioner's Meeting. Since becoming a county delegate we figured it was our duty to go check out our elected Commissioners in action and see if things were running properly and now that the convention is over, we had a bit more time to do so.
Utah County is made up of three County Commissioners who meet Tuesday mornings at 9am. We're rather astonished that the meeting is at 9am when we like many are scheduled to work. Provo has its city council meetings at 7pm when we are more able to attend. We might be able to fathom the 9am meeting time if the meeting were rebroadcast: but there is no rebroadcast of Utah County Commissioner Meetings! We discovered the only venue currently available to citizens of the County for meeting review are agenda meeting notes posted online up to two weeks later after the meeting has taken place. In other words, the review-ability for our elected Commissioners is grossly deficient: THIS MUST BE FIXED!
At today's meeting, Commissioner Anderson was excused for health reasons and Commissioners White and Ellertson reviewed a rather non-controversial agenda approving all the items 2-0. Items of interest included Health Dept Director Miner talking about a aerial mosquito abatement program, a discussion on the Jordan River Commission to have the 18 jurisdictions split a $100K bill making the river a showcase for the state, and Richard Nance presenting the results of the clean-out-the-cabinet prescription drug reclamation of nearly 900 pounds of medication (see detailed Deseret News article).
The meeting also prompted us to chronicle the attendance of our elected officials at these meetings. Below is a spreadsheet using data extracted from the official minutes of the County Commissioner meetings for 2010 (for any corrections plz comment below or see our profile for email address):
From this data we gather the following interesting conclusions:
Our County Commissioners all have superb attendance at these meetings. This is really crucial as there are only 3 to conduct business
Joel Wright and Leon Frazier were the only two Commissioner candidates to have attended ANY Commissioner meeting in 2010. We were flabbergasted that Doug Witney had yet to attend any meeting yet was able to knock out the incumbent Steve White at Saturday's convention. We wonder if this glaring absence continues how in November either Republican Witney or Democrat Barratt are going to have any clue on what the issues are or of a smooth transition. We didn't see either at today's meeting nor was Mr. Wright present. We feel it unreasonable to expect perfect attendance during a campaign for a candidate running for County Commissioner, while we do expect some attendance.
Our elected County Officials appear to be attending as they are able. We feel that all of our elected officials should be making periodic appearances whenever available at our County Commissioner meetings. We also feel there will be times when then have pressing conflicts and should not be viewed as having to attend every meeting. Furthermore, some positions may merit more frequent attendance than others. We feel all the current elected county officials are doing due diligence.
We plan on keeping track of and periodically disclose attendance at the County Commissioner Meeting as a way of doing our patriotic part to keep check on our government.
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Summary of the Convention, on to the Primary!
I was very happy with the results of the Convention, and our campaign's execution at the Convention. I believe we surprised many delegates with our ability to effectively get our message out at the Convention. I was especially happy with our speech to the delegates - the nominations went great, none of my children started crying (though one did fall asleep), and the delegates really responded to our message.
Now we have a primary. It is a completely different race than the one we had at Convention. I heard one person tell me that the Convention is sort of like a boxing match, while the Primary is sort of like a football game. I think that is a good analogy. We are actively working on our strategy for the Primary election on June 22, 2010 when every single registered Republican in Utah County (over 200,000 voters) can vote for County Commission Seat A, even though if the Primary elections in June 2006 or June 2008 are any indication, we'll likely only get 20,000 to 30,000 voters to come out. And if we don't have a Senate Primary Race, we might get even fewer. In other words, it will once again likely be a race where a few highly discerning voters will determine the outcome.
Below are the articles on the Convention from the Daily Herald, Des News and SL Trib. I include the highlights immediately below:
DAILY HERALD (at http://bit.ly/cOItev ):
"The other incumbent, Gary Anderson, will have his hands full come June when he has a primary with challenger Joel Wright in what was a very close convention vote."
Great picture of my daughter during my speech to the delegates: http://bit.ly/bFpJLr
Picture of me giving my speech to the delegates: http://bit.ly/cuzYOZ
DESERET NEWS (at: http://bit.ly/cr9Yh7 )
"There will be a primary election for the other Utah County Commission seat, as incumbent Gary Anderson and Joel Wright split the vote, 52 percent to 48 percent.
Wright said he was satisfied to take the election to a Republican primary race.
"I'm really happy. It's very hard to take out an incumbent," he said."
SALT LAKE TRIBUNE (at: http://bit.ly/cM9ns8 )
"An anti-incumbent backlash swept one Utah County Commissioner out of office and forced another into a primary battle for the Republican nomination."
....
Anderson and Wright's race went to a second ballot, as neither of them got 60 percent on the first round. During the second round, with candidate Jim Vein eliminated, Anderson received 51.6 percent to Wright's 48.4 percent.
"It's very hard to take out a powerful incumbent, who has the support of powerful types," Wright said. But he said his message of fiscal responsibility and taking on Anderson's support for the Utah County Convention Center helped with delegates.
Anderson noted the convention's anti-incumbent tone, but said he was grateful he was still in the race. He said primary voters are more representative of the party's mainstream than delegates.
"I felt good coming out of there," Anderson said. "The voters know me."
END
Now we have a primary. It is a completely different race than the one we had at Convention. I heard one person tell me that the Convention is sort of like a boxing match, while the Primary is sort of like a football game. I think that is a good analogy. We are actively working on our strategy for the Primary election on June 22, 2010 when every single registered Republican in Utah County (over 200,000 voters) can vote for County Commission Seat A, even though if the Primary elections in June 2006 or June 2008 are any indication, we'll likely only get 20,000 to 30,000 voters to come out. And if we don't have a Senate Primary Race, we might get even fewer. In other words, it will once again likely be a race where a few highly discerning voters will determine the outcome.
Below are the articles on the Convention from the Daily Herald, Des News and SL Trib. I include the highlights immediately below:
DAILY HERALD (at http://bit.ly/cOItev ):
"The other incumbent, Gary Anderson, will have his hands full come June when he has a primary with challenger Joel Wright in what was a very close convention vote."
Great picture of my daughter during my speech to the delegates: http://bit.ly/bFpJLr
Picture of me giving my speech to the delegates: http://bit.ly/cuzYOZ
DESERET NEWS (at: http://bit.ly/cr9Yh7 )
"There will be a primary election for the other Utah County Commission seat, as incumbent Gary Anderson and Joel Wright split the vote, 52 percent to 48 percent.
Wright said he was satisfied to take the election to a Republican primary race.
"I'm really happy. It's very hard to take out an incumbent," he said."
SALT LAKE TRIBUNE (at: http://bit.ly/cM9ns8 )
"An anti-incumbent backlash swept one Utah County Commissioner out of office and forced another into a primary battle for the Republican nomination."
....
Anderson and Wright's race went to a second ballot, as neither of them got 60 percent on the first round. During the second round, with candidate Jim Vein eliminated, Anderson received 51.6 percent to Wright's 48.4 percent.
"It's very hard to take out a powerful incumbent, who has the support of powerful types," Wright said. But he said his message of fiscal responsibility and taking on Anderson's support for the Utah County Convention Center helped with delegates.
Anderson noted the convention's anti-incumbent tone, but said he was grateful he was still in the race. He said primary voters are more representative of the party's mainstream than delegates.
"I felt good coming out of there," Anderson said. "The voters know me."
END
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Watch the debate between Joel Wright & Gary Anderson
Part #1 of 2 below.
Just go to this link:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=electwright&aq=f
And you can see a list of all the videos below.
Noah Webster Debate
Two weeks ago in Orem I had the opportunity to debate my opponent
on several important issues facing Utah County. Many of the
questions brought out clear differences between us on important
subjects. These questions ranged from jobs to the Utah Lake Bridge
to the County spending $40 Million on a Convention Center in Provo.
I believe the responses show clear differences to our priorities and
values.
Below you will find a summary of the responses and a link to watch
the full video for yourself on You Tube. Half of the debate will be in
this email and you will get the other half tomorrow.
Opening Statements
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGZhBT8Ok-A
Summary of Joel Wright's statements:
--We need to get more people involved
--This is a Debate on issues
--We have fundamental disagreements on certain issues
--Are we doing well enough right now? Or can we do better?
--My Experience
+Helped get a sales tax base into Cedar Hills while
on the City Council by removing obstacles to
economic development
--Proper role of Government is to remove obstacles to
Economic Development
--What got me interested in County was the roads that need County
Leadership and it’s not there
Summary of Gary Anderson's statements:
--Lives in Springville
--Ran for County Commission first in 1983
+I was elected to 2 terms then
--4 years ago approached to run for Commission
--Now we have a lot of road projects like I-15 going
Please set forward the top 5 long term problems facing
Utah County now, and discuss your proposed solution
for the biggest problem?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I2BXJmok4I
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--Live within your means
--I think Utah County can do a lot better with living within our means
--Must pay attention to new crimes
+Investment fraud gone from 30 million-104 million a year from
2006 to 2009
>It’s undermining our economy and getting worse
+Prescription Drug Abuse
>We need to be engaged
+Child Sex Abuse
>We need to give the Sheriff the resources to
combat this serious crime
--Transportation
+Government’s role is transportation
+We are at mercy of State & Federal Government
for roads
+I will push the State to give us the control and let
us keep our money here in Utah County
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--Number 1 issue is Economy
--Bring good jobs
--Next is Economic Development
--Crime is a problem but we disagree with what is the biggest
problems
--Senior Citizen issues are problems
--Transportation
+Done a lot for this
Recently Utah County borrowed 40 million dollars to
build a convention center in Provo do you think this was
a wise use of taxpayer dollars?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEke_ERefes
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--There are some serious concerns
--Decision is made and we have to make it successful though
--Must analyze decision making process
--Why did Utah County put in 40M but Provo around 7M?
--Started out purely Provo project and they get most benefits, why
County now?
--Pleasant Grove has plans for a convention center that could have
been built with private funds
--If they fixed stink at Sewer plant we could potentially get a
convention center built by private sector in Pleasant Grove
--Restaurant sales tax is paying for the Convention center and
residents of Utah County pay 80% of the restaurant tax, tourists
only pay 20%
--We are paying for the Convention center
--Opponent looks at Govt sector first, while I will remove obstacles
to private growth
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--Happened a long time ago I can’t take credit for it
--People came to Utah County saying we need a Convention center
--Nobody else would build it
--By law only County can build Convention Center
--Claims only TRT room taxes pay for the Convention Center and
then rental car fees if we need it from Rental Car & Restaurant
Taxes
--We said we have this much money what are you going to give us
to designers
--The Convention Center in Pleasant Grove “isn’t happening”
Where do you see your role in Economic Development as
a County Commissioner?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBLNN2wu_5I
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--“I think Utah County and State and govt in general has a few core
jobs and one of them is to make sure your people are working,
make sure we have good jobs in this county”
--Govt needs to compete with other states and provide incentives to
lure people in
--We said to Microsoft if you come in we will give you a tax break
--Brought in 7 companies,
--Claims nothing was happening 4 years ago, we are now in EDCU
under his watch
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--This is a critical difference between us
--Government's job is to remove obstacles to Economic Development,
keep taxes low (instead they’ve been going up), fight crime and
build infrastructure
--Tax breaks and incentives - doesn’t work long term
--Unemployment rate has grown in last 4 years, Govt isn’t responsible
for jobs, but if they are, they have done a dismal job
--We should stay in EDCU Utah
--None of the companies identified on opponent's flyer would say
opponent had anything to do with them coming
--EDCU has been in place for us since before my opponen came into
office and we should stay with them
--My job will be to remove the obstacles and let you create the jobs
and the innovation not government
On the topic of Econ Dev what can the county do about
the sewer treatment smell in the PG area?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD_epUc1WAU
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--Joel said that Commission is responsible but its independent but we
could get rid of the district and take it back over
--I’ve never smelled it but I believe them
--Problem is composting
--My stand is this, we have a new system coming in, in June or July,
until then compost should be moved off site, when done move it
back and try again, if that doesn’t work we take drastic measures
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--I agree the problem has to be solved
--There was a window to solve this earlier but we didn’t get it done
earlier, County failed at leadership
--Utah County is changing we were rural but we are rapidly becoming
urban
--Competing Property Rights is becoming a big issue
--Govt should define property rights and say who needs to take care
of what
--The independent district isn’t fair or proportionate to users or
effects, Cedar Hills with 10,000 people shouldn’t have same vote
as Pleasant Grove with triple that amount and the smell
The two of you have conflicted on whether the County has
raised taxes recently, will you please explain your position.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQdx4R-5DGk
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
-Shows chart
--Tax rate went up about 8% in 2008-2009 but its set by state, but we
still collect the same amount of taxes
--Talked about his and Joel’s tax payments for their homes
--Talks about Joel has nice house and he has a picture of it here
--Says he pays less now
--We needed to be made whole
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--We disagree
--Gary and I are privileged people in nice homes that have gone down
in value in last few years
--If you have home that is 200k or less you are paying more, property
taxes are a regressive tax
-- “We have shifted [property] tax from rich attorneys to hard
working school teachers and other working [people] of the
county”
--Ut Co has grown dramatically in last few years 68% more
expenditures since 2003, population growth only 29%
--Anderson amended the budget up by 7% in 2007, then another 14%
in 2008
--Anderson increased salary from 94k to 104 K in 2008 the same year
he raised property tax rate
+I will not vote for a budget with that commission salary
increase
--Anderson also voted to increase the sales tax by largest increase
ever not approved by vote
--Anderson wants government to be made whole, and doesn’t care
what’s happening with the people
--On property tax we can have honest debate, on sales tax there is no
debate he raised the tax
--Anderson thinks govt can solve problems, and get you a job with
taxpayer money
--It’s not commission’s job toget you a job, government's job is to
remove obstacles
What is the total county budget and how much of that
money is from Fed govt?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjbzdgYK4U4
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--Total budget is about 80M but I don’t know percentage of Fed
money in there, I admit I don’t know everything
--This is a frustrating issue when Fed govt takes money from us and
offers to give it back if we do it their way
--State govt often does the same, and so does the County to our cities
--We need to press down decisions and money to lowest level to local
officials
--I came through a small city that got hit with mandates too often
--We should get as much of this money back as we can
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--We didn’t increase budget 50%
--We get 22% from Fed Govt
--I am happy to get these monies from Fed government it is good
--We don’t want one time stimulus money
--Those guys are way out of line
--Haven’t had to raise taxes everything we’ve done without raising
taxes
As you can see we have very different views on these issues. I look
forward to talking with you more about the issues that affect Utah
County.
You are always welcome to call me on my
cell phone at 801-368-5385.
As always, I also ask for your vote April 24th at the
Utah County Convention!
Warm Regards,
Joel Wright
Joel Wright
p.s. Please always feel free to call me or email me questions or
concerns, I will always be engaged and look forward to earning
your vote!
Just go to this link:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=electwright&aq=f
And you can see a list of all the videos below.
Noah Webster Debate
Two weeks ago in Orem I had the opportunity to debate my opponent
on several important issues facing Utah County. Many of the
questions brought out clear differences between us on important
subjects. These questions ranged from jobs to the Utah Lake Bridge
to the County spending $40 Million on a Convention Center in Provo.
I believe the responses show clear differences to our priorities and
values.
Below you will find a summary of the responses and a link to watch
the full video for yourself on You Tube. Half of the debate will be in
this email and you will get the other half tomorrow.
Opening Statements
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGZhBT8Ok-A
Summary of Joel Wright's statements:
--We need to get more people involved
--This is a Debate on issues
--We have fundamental disagreements on certain issues
--Are we doing well enough right now? Or can we do better?
--My Experience
+Helped get a sales tax base into Cedar Hills while
on the City Council by removing obstacles to
economic development
--Proper role of Government is to remove obstacles to
Economic Development
--What got me interested in County was the roads that need County
Leadership and it’s not there
Summary of Gary Anderson's statements:
--Lives in Springville
--Ran for County Commission first in 1983
+I was elected to 2 terms then
--4 years ago approached to run for Commission
--Now we have a lot of road projects like I-15 going
Please set forward the top 5 long term problems facing
Utah County now, and discuss your proposed solution
for the biggest problem?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I2BXJmok4I
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--Live within your means
--I think Utah County can do a lot better with living within our means
--Must pay attention to new crimes
+Investment fraud gone from 30 million-104 million a year from
2006 to 2009
>It’s undermining our economy and getting worse
+Prescription Drug Abuse
>We need to be engaged
+Child Sex Abuse
>We need to give the Sheriff the resources to
combat this serious crime
--Transportation
+Government’s role is transportation
+We are at mercy of State & Federal Government
for roads
+I will push the State to give us the control and let
us keep our money here in Utah County
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--Number 1 issue is Economy
--Bring good jobs
--Next is Economic Development
--Crime is a problem but we disagree with what is the biggest
problems
--Senior Citizen issues are problems
--Transportation
+Done a lot for this
Recently Utah County borrowed 40 million dollars to
build a convention center in Provo do you think this was
a wise use of taxpayer dollars?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEke_ERefes
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--There are some serious concerns
--Decision is made and we have to make it successful though
--Must analyze decision making process
--Why did Utah County put in 40M but Provo around 7M?
--Started out purely Provo project and they get most benefits, why
County now?
--Pleasant Grove has plans for a convention center that could have
been built with private funds
--If they fixed stink at Sewer plant we could potentially get a
convention center built by private sector in Pleasant Grove
--Restaurant sales tax is paying for the Convention center and
residents of Utah County pay 80% of the restaurant tax, tourists
only pay 20%
--We are paying for the Convention center
--Opponent looks at Govt sector first, while I will remove obstacles
to private growth
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--Happened a long time ago I can’t take credit for it
--People came to Utah County saying we need a Convention center
--Nobody else would build it
--By law only County can build Convention Center
--Claims only TRT room taxes pay for the Convention Center and
then rental car fees if we need it from Rental Car & Restaurant
Taxes
--We said we have this much money what are you going to give us
to designers
--The Convention Center in Pleasant Grove “isn’t happening”
Where do you see your role in Economic Development as
a County Commissioner?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBLNN2wu_5I
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--“I think Utah County and State and govt in general has a few core
jobs and one of them is to make sure your people are working,
make sure we have good jobs in this county”
--Govt needs to compete with other states and provide incentives to
lure people in
--We said to Microsoft if you come in we will give you a tax break
--Brought in 7 companies,
--Claims nothing was happening 4 years ago, we are now in EDCU
under his watch
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--This is a critical difference between us
--Government's job is to remove obstacles to Economic Development,
keep taxes low (instead they’ve been going up), fight crime and
build infrastructure
--Tax breaks and incentives - doesn’t work long term
--Unemployment rate has grown in last 4 years, Govt isn’t responsible
for jobs, but if they are, they have done a dismal job
--We should stay in EDCU Utah
--None of the companies identified on opponent's flyer would say
opponent had anything to do with them coming
--EDCU has been in place for us since before my opponen came into
office and we should stay with them
--My job will be to remove the obstacles and let you create the jobs
and the innovation not government
On the topic of Econ Dev what can the county do about
the sewer treatment smell in the PG area?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD_epUc1WAU
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--Joel said that Commission is responsible but its independent but we
could get rid of the district and take it back over
--I’ve never smelled it but I believe them
--Problem is composting
--My stand is this, we have a new system coming in, in June or July,
until then compost should be moved off site, when done move it
back and try again, if that doesn’t work we take drastic measures
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--I agree the problem has to be solved
--There was a window to solve this earlier but we didn’t get it done
earlier, County failed at leadership
--Utah County is changing we were rural but we are rapidly becoming
urban
--Competing Property Rights is becoming a big issue
--Govt should define property rights and say who needs to take care
of what
--The independent district isn’t fair or proportionate to users or
effects, Cedar Hills with 10,000 people shouldn’t have same vote
as Pleasant Grove with triple that amount and the smell
The two of you have conflicted on whether the County has
raised taxes recently, will you please explain your position.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQdx4R-5DGk
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
-Shows chart
--Tax rate went up about 8% in 2008-2009 but its set by state, but we
still collect the same amount of taxes
--Talked about his and Joel’s tax payments for their homes
--Talks about Joel has nice house and he has a picture of it here
--Says he pays less now
--We needed to be made whole
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--We disagree
--Gary and I are privileged people in nice homes that have gone down
in value in last few years
--If you have home that is 200k or less you are paying more, property
taxes are a regressive tax
-- “We have shifted [property] tax from rich attorneys to hard
working school teachers and other working [people] of the
county”
--Ut Co has grown dramatically in last few years 68% more
expenditures since 2003, population growth only 29%
--Anderson amended the budget up by 7% in 2007, then another 14%
in 2008
--Anderson increased salary from 94k to 104 K in 2008 the same year
he raised property tax rate
+I will not vote for a budget with that commission salary
increase
--Anderson also voted to increase the sales tax by largest increase
ever not approved by vote
--Anderson wants government to be made whole, and doesn’t care
what’s happening with the people
--On property tax we can have honest debate, on sales tax there is no
debate he raised the tax
--Anderson thinks govt can solve problems, and get you a job with
taxpayer money
--It’s not commission’s job toget you a job, government's job is to
remove obstacles
What is the total county budget and how much of that
money is from Fed govt?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjbzdgYK4U4
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
--Total budget is about 80M but I don’t know percentage of Fed
money in there, I admit I don’t know everything
--This is a frustrating issue when Fed govt takes money from us and
offers to give it back if we do it their way
--State govt often does the same, and so does the County to our cities
--We need to press down decisions and money to lowest level to local
officials
--I came through a small city that got hit with mandates too often
--We should get as much of this money back as we can
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
--We didn’t increase budget 50%
--We get 22% from Fed Govt
--I am happy to get these monies from Fed government it is good
--We don’t want one time stimulus money
--Those guys are way out of line
--Haven’t had to raise taxes everything we’ve done without raising
taxes
As you can see we have very different views on these issues. I look
forward to talking with you more about the issues that affect Utah
County.
You are always welcome to call me on my
cell phone at 801-368-5385.
As always, I also ask for your vote April 24th at the
Utah County Convention!
Warm Regards,
Joel Wright
Joel Wright
p.s. Please always feel free to call me or email me questions or
concerns, I will always be engaged and look forward to earning
your vote!
Response to Linda Houskeeper, and a Challenge to Gary Anderson
Since one of Gary Anderson’s campaign supporters, Linda Houskeeper, made a series of baseless attacks on our campaign last Tuesday, we have been hoping that Gary Anderson would publicly distance himself from the actions of one of his supporters. Since he has not yet done so, we feel obligated to defend ourselves from these baseless charges, and challenge Gary Anderson to refuse to participate in any more Meet the Candidate events sponsored by Linda Houskeeper unless all county candidates are invited to attend, which is what the overwhelming majority of the county delegates would prefer.
Campaign Tactics used by Linda Houskeeper and Sandi Hoffman, supporters of Gary Anderson
Facts:
1. Linda Houskeeper is currently a Republican candidate for Utah County Commissioner Seat B, and Sandi Hoffman is a county employee.
2. Both Ms. Houskeeper and Ms. Hoffman are supporters of Gary Anderson for Utah County Commissioner Seat A, and are doing everything they can to help Gary win a fourth term as County Commissioner against Joel Wright.
3. Ms. Houskeeper scheduled a number of Meet & Mingle events that were advertised to the county delegates as being held for all county candidates with all county delegates invited. The emails advertising these events did not disclose they were Linda Houskeeper campaign events, as required under Utah Code 20A-11-901. The sign at the door of each Meet & Mingle event stated “Utah County Republican Party – Meet and Mingle – Utah County Office Candidates” – and did not clarify they were Linda Houskeeper campaign events. This gave most, if not all, county delegates the false impression that the Utah County Republican Party was sponsoring these events, instead of being sponsored by the candidate Linda Houskeeper.
4. At the Meet & Mingle scheduled by Ms. Houskeeper on Tuesday, April 6th, Ms. Hoffman came over to Mr. Wright’s table and repeatedly interrupted a conversation Mr. Wright was having with a delegate who was complaining about the difficulties he encounters in filing personal property taxes. Ms. Hoffman told the delegate that she makes such filings all the time and they are easy to do.
5. Mr. Wright then asked Ms. Hoffman to stop interrupting their conversation because he wanted to hear from the delegate.
6. Ms. Hoffman then raised her voice and called Mr. Wright a “liar” because “everyone knew Mr. Wright had promised to cut the salaries of county employees if elected, and now he was saying something different.”
7. Mr. Wright told Ms. Hoffman that he would indeed likely propose a cut to the salaries of county employees if the economy got worse and the tax revenue continued to decline, and would make no promises either way.
8. Ms. Hoffman called Mr. Wright a liar again, and then Mr. Wright’s campaign manager intervened and asked her why she was doing this. They spoke for a short while, and Ms. Hoffman then left, and she was not crying at any point. Mr. Wright’s campaign believes Ms. Hoffman has no grounds for her claim that “I have never been so publicly humiliated in my whole life.”
9. Mr. Wright never used any personal attacks or disparaging comments in his conversation with Ms. Hoffman. In contrast, Ms. Hoffman called Joel Wright a liar.
10. After this incident, Ms. Houskeeper asked Joel Wright about it, and Joel Wright discussed the event extensively with her on several occasions along with at least one witness of the event. Ms. Houskeeper then decided to “uninvite” Joel Wright from attending all future Meet & Mingle events based on this incident.
11. Ms. Houskeeper has also “uninvited” Jeff Buhman, the only Republican candidate for County Attorney, from attending her Meet & Mingle events, because she also dislikes him for reasons we do not understand, but we believe to be without merit.
12. Ms. Houskeeper continued to promote her Meet & Mingle events as open to all County Candidates, despite the fact she had uninvited both Joel Wright and County Attorney Jeff Buhman.
13. Joel Wright’s campaign then did their homework, and learned there are a number of restrictions on public buildings holding campaign events. Our campaign shared this research with the public charter school in Salem, and they concluded that their tax exempt status could be revoked if they held a campaign event that favored one candidate over another (see applicable IRS guidance here: http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html), and they also learned that their insurance through the State of Utah would not cover any campaign event because the taxpayers would then be subsidizing a political campaign. The school then informed Ms. Houskeeper of these facts.
14. Ms. Houskeeper’s response to these facts provides tremendous insight into her true motives. When Ms. Houskeeper was informed that the public charter school in Salem could not host the Meet & Mingle unless all candidates were invited, Ms. Houskeeper sent Joel an email dated 9:58 AM on Tuesday, April 20, revoking her previous “uninvite” and re-inviting Joel Wright to attend the Meet & Mingle that night. In other words, if Ms. Houskeeper truly believed that the incident she cited above was a legitimate reason for “uninviting” Joel Wright from attending any future Meet & Mingle events, she immediately discarded that reason once it was not in her best interests. In other words, she did not “uninvite” Joel Wright on principle – she only uninvited Joel Wright because she thought it was in her best interests, and then immediately re-invited Mr. Wright once it was in her best interests to do so.
15. The public charter school in Salem then informed Joel Wright that because he had been invited, that they would go ahead and allow Ms. Houskeeper to hold her Meet & Mingle that night at their school, so long as Ms. Houskeeper could provide event insurance as they were required to do so by the State of Utah’s Division of Risk Management. (Call Morris Haggerty at the State of Utah at 801-538-956 to confirm the requirement that a public charter school may not use their insurance on a campaign event.)
16. Ms. Houskeeper failed to provide event insurance to the public charter school in Salem by that afternoon as required, so the public charter school cancelled the event.
17. Ms. Houskeeper then indirectly “uninvited” Joel Wright again to all the remaining Meet & Mingles on the afternoon of Tuesday, April 20, when she sent out an email to all county delegates stating I was “officially uninvited” from all the remaining events. Once again she violated the law by failing to disclose these were Linda Houskeeper campaign events, as required under Utah Code 20A-11-901.
18. Ms. Houskeeper also accused Mr. Wright of using “legal tactics” to prevent her from hosting a Meet & Mingle the night of Tuesday, April 20 at the public charter school in Salem. Mr. Wright’s campaign respectfully disagrees, and believes that all elected officials take an oath to uphold and defend the law, so candidates should respect all applicable laws, even when such laws are not convenient or in your favor.
Our Challenge to Gary Anderson:
Please make a public statement today that you will not attend any campaign events for multiple county candidates going forward unless ALL county candidates are invited, including Joel Wright and Jeff Buhman. And then please refuse to attend any such events unless you have solid proof that all county candidates have been invited. Note that Joel Wright promises you that he will not attend any campaign event for multiple county candidates unless you are invited on equal terms as well.
Note that Joel Wright’s campaign is not asking Gary Anderson to determine the truth of the facts above. We are simply asking him to comply with the wishes of the overwhelming majority of the county delegates to allow all candidates to attend so they can decide for themselves who deserves their vote.
Campaign Tactics used by Linda Houskeeper and Sandi Hoffman, supporters of Gary Anderson
Facts:
1. Linda Houskeeper is currently a Republican candidate for Utah County Commissioner Seat B, and Sandi Hoffman is a county employee.
2. Both Ms. Houskeeper and Ms. Hoffman are supporters of Gary Anderson for Utah County Commissioner Seat A, and are doing everything they can to help Gary win a fourth term as County Commissioner against Joel Wright.
3. Ms. Houskeeper scheduled a number of Meet & Mingle events that were advertised to the county delegates as being held for all county candidates with all county delegates invited. The emails advertising these events did not disclose they were Linda Houskeeper campaign events, as required under Utah Code 20A-11-901. The sign at the door of each Meet & Mingle event stated “Utah County Republican Party – Meet and Mingle – Utah County Office Candidates” – and did not clarify they were Linda Houskeeper campaign events. This gave most, if not all, county delegates the false impression that the Utah County Republican Party was sponsoring these events, instead of being sponsored by the candidate Linda Houskeeper.
4. At the Meet & Mingle scheduled by Ms. Houskeeper on Tuesday, April 6th, Ms. Hoffman came over to Mr. Wright’s table and repeatedly interrupted a conversation Mr. Wright was having with a delegate who was complaining about the difficulties he encounters in filing personal property taxes. Ms. Hoffman told the delegate that she makes such filings all the time and they are easy to do.
5. Mr. Wright then asked Ms. Hoffman to stop interrupting their conversation because he wanted to hear from the delegate.
6. Ms. Hoffman then raised her voice and called Mr. Wright a “liar” because “everyone knew Mr. Wright had promised to cut the salaries of county employees if elected, and now he was saying something different.”
7. Mr. Wright told Ms. Hoffman that he would indeed likely propose a cut to the salaries of county employees if the economy got worse and the tax revenue continued to decline, and would make no promises either way.
8. Ms. Hoffman called Mr. Wright a liar again, and then Mr. Wright’s campaign manager intervened and asked her why she was doing this. They spoke for a short while, and Ms. Hoffman then left, and she was not crying at any point. Mr. Wright’s campaign believes Ms. Hoffman has no grounds for her claim that “I have never been so publicly humiliated in my whole life.”
9. Mr. Wright never used any personal attacks or disparaging comments in his conversation with Ms. Hoffman. In contrast, Ms. Hoffman called Joel Wright a liar.
10. After this incident, Ms. Houskeeper asked Joel Wright about it, and Joel Wright discussed the event extensively with her on several occasions along with at least one witness of the event. Ms. Houskeeper then decided to “uninvite” Joel Wright from attending all future Meet & Mingle events based on this incident.
11. Ms. Houskeeper has also “uninvited” Jeff Buhman, the only Republican candidate for County Attorney, from attending her Meet & Mingle events, because she also dislikes him for reasons we do not understand, but we believe to be without merit.
12. Ms. Houskeeper continued to promote her Meet & Mingle events as open to all County Candidates, despite the fact she had uninvited both Joel Wright and County Attorney Jeff Buhman.
13. Joel Wright’s campaign then did their homework, and learned there are a number of restrictions on public buildings holding campaign events. Our campaign shared this research with the public charter school in Salem, and they concluded that their tax exempt status could be revoked if they held a campaign event that favored one candidate over another (see applicable IRS guidance here: http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html), and they also learned that their insurance through the State of Utah would not cover any campaign event because the taxpayers would then be subsidizing a political campaign. The school then informed Ms. Houskeeper of these facts.
14. Ms. Houskeeper’s response to these facts provides tremendous insight into her true motives. When Ms. Houskeeper was informed that the public charter school in Salem could not host the Meet & Mingle unless all candidates were invited, Ms. Houskeeper sent Joel an email dated 9:58 AM on Tuesday, April 20, revoking her previous “uninvite” and re-inviting Joel Wright to attend the Meet & Mingle that night. In other words, if Ms. Houskeeper truly believed that the incident she cited above was a legitimate reason for “uninviting” Joel Wright from attending any future Meet & Mingle events, she immediately discarded that reason once it was not in her best interests. In other words, she did not “uninvite” Joel Wright on principle – she only uninvited Joel Wright because she thought it was in her best interests, and then immediately re-invited Mr. Wright once it was in her best interests to do so.
15. The public charter school in Salem then informed Joel Wright that because he had been invited, that they would go ahead and allow Ms. Houskeeper to hold her Meet & Mingle that night at their school, so long as Ms. Houskeeper could provide event insurance as they were required to do so by the State of Utah’s Division of Risk Management. (Call Morris Haggerty at the State of Utah at 801-538-956 to confirm the requirement that a public charter school may not use their insurance on a campaign event.)
16. Ms. Houskeeper failed to provide event insurance to the public charter school in Salem by that afternoon as required, so the public charter school cancelled the event.
17. Ms. Houskeeper then indirectly “uninvited” Joel Wright again to all the remaining Meet & Mingles on the afternoon of Tuesday, April 20, when she sent out an email to all county delegates stating I was “officially uninvited” from all the remaining events. Once again she violated the law by failing to disclose these were Linda Houskeeper campaign events, as required under Utah Code 20A-11-901.
18. Ms. Houskeeper also accused Mr. Wright of using “legal tactics” to prevent her from hosting a Meet & Mingle the night of Tuesday, April 20 at the public charter school in Salem. Mr. Wright’s campaign respectfully disagrees, and believes that all elected officials take an oath to uphold and defend the law, so candidates should respect all applicable laws, even when such laws are not convenient or in your favor.
Our Challenge to Gary Anderson:
Please make a public statement today that you will not attend any campaign events for multiple county candidates going forward unless ALL county candidates are invited, including Joel Wright and Jeff Buhman. And then please refuse to attend any such events unless you have solid proof that all county candidates have been invited. Note that Joel Wright promises you that he will not attend any campaign event for multiple county candidates unless you are invited on equal terms as well.
Note that Joel Wright’s campaign is not asking Gary Anderson to determine the truth of the facts above. We are simply asking him to comply with the wishes of the overwhelming majority of the county delegates to allow all candidates to attend so they can decide for themselves who deserves their vote.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Clear Differences on Proposed Bridge Over Utah Lake
Last week in Orem I had the opportunity to debate my opponent on
several important issues facing Utah County. One of the questions
was on the Utah Lake Bridge proposal. I believe the responses once
again show clear differences to our approaches and feelings about the
issues.
Below you will find a summary of the responses and a link to watch
the full video for yourself on You Tube. We will also be putting the
other questions and answers on You Tube from that debate over the
next couple days.
The Question was:
There is a proposal to build a bridge across Utah Lake by a
private group. Do you support this effort? If so, how can you
guarantee the taxpayers won’t foot the bill should the group fold?
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
1. Governor Herbert and his administrative staff will decide this.
2. If the private sector can come and solve one of our transportation
problems, let's make it happen. I'm all for it.
3. The State of Utah should return to Utah County all the revenue
they get from leasing the easement over Utah Lake, and Utah County
should insure that 100% of those funds go to improving the Lake.
4. There should be a construction (or completion) bond on the
construction to make sure the bridge will be completed when it is
started.
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
1. I am not for the bridge proposed right now.
2. We need to do an Environmental Impact Study "EIS", and let that
study tell us if a bridge is feasible
3. There are three developers that will pay for the bridge wanted by
the Lake, which an EIS will tell us
4. The developer/owner of the bridge should not make a profit from
the bridge because they will make so much money from the land
across the lake once it becomes accessible. Direct quote: "We have
them develop it, we have them build it, and then the money
(and this is another problem I have with the present bridge) the
money, if that is a toll bridge and it has to be a $2 toll or
something, the money that is made in excess of the debt service on
that bridge goes back into the Lake."
YouTube Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEK0f7mJL_A
As you can see we have very different views on this issue. I look
forward to talking with you more about the issues that affect Utah
County including the Bridge.
If you would like to talk in person please see the complete schedule
of all such meetings here:
http://wright4countycommissioner.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-you-can-meet-me-in-person.html
Alternatively, you are always welcome to call me on my
cell phone at 801-368-5385.
As always, I also ask for your vote April 24th at the
Utah County Convention!
Warm Regards,
Joel Wright
p.s. Please always feel free to call me or email me questions or
concerns, I will always be engaged and look forward to earning
your vote!
several important issues facing Utah County. One of the questions
was on the Utah Lake Bridge proposal. I believe the responses once
again show clear differences to our approaches and feelings about the
issues.
Below you will find a summary of the responses and a link to watch
the full video for yourself on You Tube. We will also be putting the
other questions and answers on You Tube from that debate over the
next couple days.
The Question was:
There is a proposal to build a bridge across Utah Lake by a
private group. Do you support this effort? If so, how can you
guarantee the taxpayers won’t foot the bill should the group fold?
Summary of Joel Wright's answer:
1. Governor Herbert and his administrative staff will decide this.
2. If the private sector can come and solve one of our transportation
problems, let's make it happen. I'm all for it.
3. The State of Utah should return to Utah County all the revenue
they get from leasing the easement over Utah Lake, and Utah County
should insure that 100% of those funds go to improving the Lake.
4. There should be a construction (or completion) bond on the
construction to make sure the bridge will be completed when it is
started.
Summary of Gary Anderson's answer:
1. I am not for the bridge proposed right now.
2. We need to do an Environmental Impact Study "EIS", and let that
study tell us if a bridge is feasible
3. There are three developers that will pay for the bridge wanted by
the Lake, which an EIS will tell us
4. The developer/owner of the bridge should not make a profit from
the bridge because they will make so much money from the land
across the lake once it becomes accessible. Direct quote: "We have
them develop it, we have them build it, and then the money
(and this is another problem I have with the present bridge) the
money, if that is a toll bridge and it has to be a $2 toll or
something, the money that is made in excess of the debt service on
that bridge goes back into the Lake."
YouTube Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEK0f7mJL_A
As you can see we have very different views on this issue. I look
forward to talking with you more about the issues that affect Utah
County including the Bridge.
If you would like to talk in person please see the complete schedule
of all such meetings here:
http://wright4countycommissioner.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-you-can-meet-me-in-person.html
Alternatively, you are always welcome to call me on my
cell phone at 801-368-5385.
As always, I also ask for your vote April 24th at the
Utah County Convention!
Warm Regards,
Joel Wright
p.s. Please always feel free to call me or email me questions or
concerns, I will always be engaged and look forward to earning
your vote!
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Fiscal Facts on Utah County (4-9-10 email to county delegates)
I sent the email below to all County Delegates on the morning of Friday, April 9, 2010. It goes through and details the Fiscal Facts on Utah County, and explains my position in response to the claims from Gary Anderson. I have included Gary Anderson's email below for you to review because I want to earn the vote of delegates who have reviewed the claims, and verified the facts.
Dear County Delegate,
Wednesday you received an email from Gary Anderson with a number of claims about our campaign for Utah County Commissioner. I would like to take a few moments of your time to respond. You are always welcome to call me on my cell phone directly at 801-368-5385. I’ll first cover the fiscal facts that you can verify, address the claims in Commissioner Anderson’s email, and then make three promises to you that you will be able to verify if I run for re-election in four years.
FISCAL FACTS
1. Utah County’s expenditures have grown twice as fast as our population the last five years. Utah County’s expenditures have grown 68% in the last 5 years, from $51.04 million (in 2003) to $85.78 million (in 2008).[1] During that same time, Utah County’s population only grew 29.6%, from 409,000 to 530,000.[2]
2. Commissioner Anderson has supported these increases in the budget. Shortly after Commissioner Anderson was sworn in for his third term (2 terms in the late 80s previously) in, he approved amending the budget to increase it by 7% in 2007,[3] and then was the deciding vote (by 2 to 1) to approve a substantial 14% increase to the 2008 budget.[4] This rapid increase in spending led the Utah County Auditor to warn in 2008 that such expenditures would deplete the surplus (or general fund) and created a budget situation that “will not be sustainable in subsequent years without either new revenue sources or increased revenue from existing sources.”[5]
3. Commissioner Anderson voted to increase his salary by 10% in 2008. Commissioner Anderson was the deciding vote (by 2 to 1) to increase the salary of the Utah County Commissioners from $94,700 to $104,000 in June 2008.[6] In November 2009 I suggested this salary increase be rolled back to ease the burden on tax payers, and was rebuked by Commissioner Anderson.[7]
4. Commissioner Anderson voted for the largest combined sales tax increase in Utah County’s history that was not approved by the voters. In August 2007, Commissioner Anderson voted to increase the voter approved 0.25 percent sales tax for transportation (2006) by 20% up to .30 percent in 2007.[8] Further Commissioner Anderson voted in September of 2008 to further increase it by almost 100% more to .55 percent. [9] We certainly need transportation projects, but I believe any sales tax increase should be put before the voters so they can determine if it is justified.
5. Property Taxes Increased in 2008 and 2009: Utah County’s property taxes had stayed relatively modest and stable until 2008, when Utah County received a windfall due to the Utah State Tax Commission allowing a one time change in the assessing and collecting rate without going through the truth-in-taxation process, which resulted in the Utah County’s property tax revenue going from $25,430,082 to $30,299,437 from 2007 to 2008, or a 19% increase, in a single year.[10] It would have been responsible to either return this windfall to the taxpayers, or at least save it, but instead it was immediately spent on the growing budget. Because the surplus had been used up, Utah County then had to raise property tax rates by 8.5% in 2009[11] when our property values declined so Utah County could collect the same amount of revenue, even though it means they were now taking a larger percentage of your home’s value, or a bigger piece of the pie.
6. $40 million in new debt for the Convention Center in Provo: We can have honest disagreements on the Convention Center, including whether it is the proper role of government, why Utah County is paying $40 million for the Convention Center while Provo is only paying approximately $7 million, and whether the private sector would have built a convention center for our County in Pleasant Grove. But we cannot debate that the taxpayers of Utah County are paying for the Convention Center, because they clearly are. According to the Preliminary Offering Statement used to sell the Convention Center debt to investors, the annual debt service on the Convention Center will be paid as follows: 7% from the tax on hotel rooms, 11% from the tax on car rentals, and 82% by the one percent tax on restaurant food in Utah County.[12] While the tax on hotel rooms and car rentals are typically paid by visitors from out side our County (while also being paid by local businesses bringing in clients and employees), the tax on restaurant food in Utah County is paid overwhelmingly by the residents of Utah County, and most informed observers believe approximately 80% of the restaurant tax is paid for by the residents of Utah County.[13] Bottom Line: While tourists and business will generate up to 40% of the revenue to cover the debt service on the Convention Center, the tax payers of Utah County will pay the most of the cost of the Convention Center. Furthermore, without the Convention Center’s debt service, the restaurant tax could have been decreased substantially, easing the tax burden on our residents.
CLAIMS FROM
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
1. Claim: “Mr. Wright wants to expand the county commission to a council form of government or expand it to five commissioners.”
True? Partially. Our campaign wants to trust the voters to decide how best to govern Utah County. The current form of government (3 full time County Commissioners) has no checks and balances, has no regional representation, and is not based on the Constitution. If only two county commissioners would trust the voters, then the form of county government would be put on the ballot, and the voters could decide to consider a potential change. If the voters approved the change, then a study commission would be created to recommend a potential change to either a Mayor/County Council form (Salt Lake and Cache counties have done this), or a full time executive and part time county council (Grand, Morgan, Summit and Wasatch have done this) or five or seven full time county commissioners (no county has done this, but former Utah County Commissioner and current Governor Gary Herbert told me in February 2010 that he publicly supports increasing the full time Commissioners in Utah County from 3 to 5). Such recommendation would then be on the ballot, and the voters could accept or reject their recommendation. In other words, the voters would directly decide this issue, not the Utah County Commissioners. Finally, I believe the best choice would be a full time Mayor and five part time county council members, which would cost substantially LESS than the current form of three full time county commissioners. Right now, three full time county commissioners cost Utah County $312,000/year in salary, while a full time Mayor (at $104,000/year), and five part time county council members (at $20,000/year) would only cost Utah County $204,000/year.[14]
2. Claim: “Mr. Wright wants our county to take over jurisdiction from the State all of the roads in Utah County that do not cross county lines.”
True? Yes, but only on fair terms. I believe Utah County can more effectively govern its future if it controls the roads within Utah County that do not cross county lines. However, I would only accept the transfer of such roads to the extent the State allows us to keep the funding associated with such roads. As a former City Council member, I have seen the arrogance of our Federal Government, the State of Utah and even Utah County with a “one size fits all” approach on certain issues. As Dr. Skousen points out in the 5,000 Year Leap, one of the principles of the Founding Fathers was that “Problems were solved to the greatest possible extent on the level where they originated.”[15] In short, we should not be expecting citizens of another county to be funding Utah County's roads, nor should they expect us to fund their roads. To the greatest extent possible, where roads need repair, or where residents desire new roads, I believe we should be funding them ourselves rather than forcing others to help pay for them.
3. Claim: “Mr. Wright wants to give the County Attorney more funds to prosecute White-collar crime.”
True? Yes, absolutely. I believe investment fraud is at epidemic levels and is harming our economy far more than any form of “economic development” by the government can improve our economy. In 2009, the Utah County Attorney received claims of $104 million in investment fraud. When Commissioner Anderson assumed office in 2007, those claims were less than $20 million annually. Since 2000, the Utah County Attorney has received investment fraud claims totaling $432 million.[16] We need seasoned and experienced investigators and prosecutors to fight this relatively complicated form of crime that has done tremendous damage to our property values, and our community’s ability to remain solvent and self-sufficient. On October 24, 2009, County Attorney Buhman was quoted as follows: "The honest truth is we're barely scratching the surface [on investment fraud]. We could double or triple our department easily, and we would still be extremely busy."[17] However, I am unwilling to raise taxes to increase the resources devoted to investment fraud, but I will find savings from other areas to do so. The very first cut will be $10,000 to the salary of each of the County Commissioners, giving us another $30,000 to fight investment fraud immediately.
4. Claim: “I believe we should be involved in and support Economic Development in Utah County. Mr. Wright does not.”
You have to define “Economic Development.” I believe government does not know better than the private sector how to most effectively allocate resources, and should instead live within its means and do the jobs it is given, namely fight crime and build transportation infrastructure, as effectively as possible. In contrast, Commissioner Anderson has said on multiple occasions that “It is the government’s job to help you get jobs.” Nonetheless, I support the relatively minimal expense for the Economic Development Corporation of Utah to help companies that are already attracted to Utah find the best location for their operations in Utah. Commissioner Anderson claims that 1,027 jobs have come to Utah County in the last 2 years due to his work, even though he offers no evidence that his personal efforts made any difference.
Finally, I make three promises to you that you will be able to verify four years from now, and that Commissioner Anderson is unwilling to make:
1. I will vote against any budget that includes an increase in the property tax rate in the next four years. Our citizens and businesses have to live within their means. It is time for Utah County to do the same.
2. I will vote against any budget that includes the 2008 salary increase from $94,700 to $104,000 for the County Commissioners, and vote against any salary increase for Commissioners in the next 4 years. Everyone is doing more with less. It is time for our Commissioners to lead by example.
3. I will not run for more than two terms as a Utah County Commissioner. Our founding fathers understood the problems with any individual accumulating too much power, and becoming a career politician. I believe no one should serve in any Executive Branch position for more than two terms, and that includes our County Commissioners. In contrast, my opponent is asking you for a fourth term in office.
Thank you very much for engaging with me in an informed discussion of these issues.
I would warmly welcome an opportunity to discuss these issues with you at length. Please join me at any of the meetings below where we will discuss these issues in depth:
1. Saturday, April 10 from 6 PM to 8 PM at the home of Oak Norton in Highland at 10812 North 5800 West.
2. Tuesday, April 13 from 5:30 PM to 9:30 PM at the Cotton Tree Inn in Provo at 2230 North University Parkway. Light refreshments will be provided.
3. Wednesday, April 14 from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM at the home of Karen Herd in Cedar Hills at 10669 Fiddlesticks.
4. Saturday, April 17 from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM at the home of Kirk & Shannon Magleby at 553 East 100 North in American Fork.
I will also be attending all the mass meetings for county candidates in the next three weeks, which includes events in Santaquin, Lehi, Eagle Mountain, Provo and multiple times in Springville. Please see the complete schedule of all such meetings here:
http://wright4countycommissioner.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-you-can-meet-me-in-person.html
Alternatively, you are always welcome to call me on my cell phone at 801-368-5385.
As always, I also ask for your vote April 24th at the Utah County Convention!
Warm Regards,
Joel Wright
Joel Wright
p.s. If you want further clarification please give me a call. 801-368-5385
p.p.s. Let me know what you think on these issues! I always welcome feedback.
SOURCES
[1] Numbers from 2004 to 2008 available at http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xbutco.pdf , 2009 numbers from http://www.sltrib.com/utahcounty/ci_13862040 (Note that final official expenditures for 2009 are not yet available.)
[2] See http://www.census.gov/
[3] 2007 Lower budget was approved in 2006, but subsequently amended after Commissioner Anderson came into office in 2007, see: http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xbutco.pdf
[4] See the Minutes from the December 18, 2007 Utah County Commission Meeting, Item #26: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/COMMISH/Data/Minutes/CM/2007/121807-CommissionMinutes.pdf
[5] See page 9 of the 2008 Financial Statements from the Independent Auditor here: http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xfutco.pdf
[6] See the Minutes from the June 17, 2008 Commission Meeting, Item #1: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/Commish/data/minutes/CM/2008/061708-CommissionMinutes.pdf ; see also the Deseret News article dated June 18, 2008: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700235619/Utah-County-commissioners-hike-pay.html
[7] See the blog of Daily Herald reporter Joe Pyrah here: http://sausagegrinding.blogspot.com/2009/11/game-on.html
[8] See Item #22 on the August 28, 2007 Commission Minutes at: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/Commish/data/minutes/CM/2007/082807-CommissionMinutes.pdf
[9] See item #17 on the September 23, 2008 Commission Minutes at: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/Commish/data/minutes/CM/2008/092308-Commission-Minutes.pdf
[10] See page 46 of the 2008 Financial Statements here: http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xfutco.pdf
[11] Such information not yet available in official Financial Statements, but available on every property tax notice in Utah County. The Utah County Tax Levy was .000809 in 2008, and increased to .000878 in 2009, which is an 8.5% increase.
[12] Copy of the Preliminary Financial Statement (page 3) obtained from Utah County in February 2010 through a GRAMA request. Email Joel Wright at Joel@ElectWright.com if you would like a copy of it.
[13] The Utah Restaurant Association told me that at least 80% of the restaurant tax is paid for by the residents of Utah County, and likely over 90%. I have also had conversations with Commissioners Anderson and White, as well as Rep. Frank who tried to repeal this tax earlier this year, and they all have said to me that approximately 80% of the restaurant tax is paid for by Utah County residents.
[14] See our campaign blog for more details on this proposed change here: http://wright4countycommissioner.blogspot.com/2009/11/should-utah-county-change-its-form-of_18.html
[15] See page 16 of the “5,000 Year Leap” by W. Cleon Skousen.
[16] See: “Investment Fraud Rampant in Utah County” from the Daily Herald, February 28, 2010, available at: http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/article_7c2429f4-a9ed-5ce2-af14-a40ed6c7b8bc.html, or see “Investigators say $59 million scheme targeted Utah County” from Deseret News, October 24, 2009, available at: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705339222/Investigators-say-59-million-scheme-targeted-Utah-County.html?pg=4 ; the number of $432 million from 2000 to 2009 is from an email from the Utah County Bureau of Investigations in our possession that we are happy to share.
[17] See “Investigators say $59 million scheme targeted Utah County” from Deseret News, October 24, 2009, available at: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705339222/Investigators-say-59-million-scheme-targeted-Utah-County.html?pg=4
Dear County Delegate,
Wednesday you received an email from Gary Anderson with a number of claims about our campaign for Utah County Commissioner. I would like to take a few moments of your time to respond. You are always welcome to call me on my cell phone directly at 801-368-5385. I’ll first cover the fiscal facts that you can verify, address the claims in Commissioner Anderson’s email, and then make three promises to you that you will be able to verify if I run for re-election in four years.
FISCAL FACTS
1. Utah County’s expenditures have grown twice as fast as our population the last five years. Utah County’s expenditures have grown 68% in the last 5 years, from $51.04 million (in 2003) to $85.78 million (in 2008).[1] During that same time, Utah County’s population only grew 29.6%, from 409,000 to 530,000.[2]
2. Commissioner Anderson has supported these increases in the budget. Shortly after Commissioner Anderson was sworn in for his third term (2 terms in the late 80s previously) in, he approved amending the budget to increase it by 7% in 2007,[3] and then was the deciding vote (by 2 to 1) to approve a substantial 14% increase to the 2008 budget.[4] This rapid increase in spending led the Utah County Auditor to warn in 2008 that such expenditures would deplete the surplus (or general fund) and created a budget situation that “will not be sustainable in subsequent years without either new revenue sources or increased revenue from existing sources.”[5]
3. Commissioner Anderson voted to increase his salary by 10% in 2008. Commissioner Anderson was the deciding vote (by 2 to 1) to increase the salary of the Utah County Commissioners from $94,700 to $104,000 in June 2008.[6] In November 2009 I suggested this salary increase be rolled back to ease the burden on tax payers, and was rebuked by Commissioner Anderson.[7]
4. Commissioner Anderson voted for the largest combined sales tax increase in Utah County’s history that was not approved by the voters. In August 2007, Commissioner Anderson voted to increase the voter approved 0.25 percent sales tax for transportation (2006) by 20% up to .30 percent in 2007.[8] Further Commissioner Anderson voted in September of 2008 to further increase it by almost 100% more to .55 percent. [9] We certainly need transportation projects, but I believe any sales tax increase should be put before the voters so they can determine if it is justified.
5. Property Taxes Increased in 2008 and 2009: Utah County’s property taxes had stayed relatively modest and stable until 2008, when Utah County received a windfall due to the Utah State Tax Commission allowing a one time change in the assessing and collecting rate without going through the truth-in-taxation process, which resulted in the Utah County’s property tax revenue going from $25,430,082 to $30,299,437 from 2007 to 2008, or a 19% increase, in a single year.[10] It would have been responsible to either return this windfall to the taxpayers, or at least save it, but instead it was immediately spent on the growing budget. Because the surplus had been used up, Utah County then had to raise property tax rates by 8.5% in 2009[11] when our property values declined so Utah County could collect the same amount of revenue, even though it means they were now taking a larger percentage of your home’s value, or a bigger piece of the pie.
6. $40 million in new debt for the Convention Center in Provo: We can have honest disagreements on the Convention Center, including whether it is the proper role of government, why Utah County is paying $40 million for the Convention Center while Provo is only paying approximately $7 million, and whether the private sector would have built a convention center for our County in Pleasant Grove. But we cannot debate that the taxpayers of Utah County are paying for the Convention Center, because they clearly are. According to the Preliminary Offering Statement used to sell the Convention Center debt to investors, the annual debt service on the Convention Center will be paid as follows: 7% from the tax on hotel rooms, 11% from the tax on car rentals, and 82% by the one percent tax on restaurant food in Utah County.[12] While the tax on hotel rooms and car rentals are typically paid by visitors from out side our County (while also being paid by local businesses bringing in clients and employees), the tax on restaurant food in Utah County is paid overwhelmingly by the residents of Utah County, and most informed observers believe approximately 80% of the restaurant tax is paid for by the residents of Utah County.[13] Bottom Line: While tourists and business will generate up to 40% of the revenue to cover the debt service on the Convention Center, the tax payers of Utah County will pay the most of the cost of the Convention Center. Furthermore, without the Convention Center’s debt service, the restaurant tax could have been decreased substantially, easing the tax burden on our residents.
CLAIMS FROM
COMMISSIONER ANDERSON
1. Claim: “Mr. Wright wants to expand the county commission to a council form of government or expand it to five commissioners.”
True? Partially. Our campaign wants to trust the voters to decide how best to govern Utah County. The current form of government (3 full time County Commissioners) has no checks and balances, has no regional representation, and is not based on the Constitution. If only two county commissioners would trust the voters, then the form of county government would be put on the ballot, and the voters could decide to consider a potential change. If the voters approved the change, then a study commission would be created to recommend a potential change to either a Mayor/County Council form (Salt Lake and Cache counties have done this), or a full time executive and part time county council (Grand, Morgan, Summit and Wasatch have done this) or five or seven full time county commissioners (no county has done this, but former Utah County Commissioner and current Governor Gary Herbert told me in February 2010 that he publicly supports increasing the full time Commissioners in Utah County from 3 to 5). Such recommendation would then be on the ballot, and the voters could accept or reject their recommendation. In other words, the voters would directly decide this issue, not the Utah County Commissioners. Finally, I believe the best choice would be a full time Mayor and five part time county council members, which would cost substantially LESS than the current form of three full time county commissioners. Right now, three full time county commissioners cost Utah County $312,000/year in salary, while a full time Mayor (at $104,000/year), and five part time county council members (at $20,000/year) would only cost Utah County $204,000/year.[14]
2. Claim: “Mr. Wright wants our county to take over jurisdiction from the State all of the roads in Utah County that do not cross county lines.”
True? Yes, but only on fair terms. I believe Utah County can more effectively govern its future if it controls the roads within Utah County that do not cross county lines. However, I would only accept the transfer of such roads to the extent the State allows us to keep the funding associated with such roads. As a former City Council member, I have seen the arrogance of our Federal Government, the State of Utah and even Utah County with a “one size fits all” approach on certain issues. As Dr. Skousen points out in the 5,000 Year Leap, one of the principles of the Founding Fathers was that “Problems were solved to the greatest possible extent on the level where they originated.”[15] In short, we should not be expecting citizens of another county to be funding Utah County's roads, nor should they expect us to fund their roads. To the greatest extent possible, where roads need repair, or where residents desire new roads, I believe we should be funding them ourselves rather than forcing others to help pay for them.
3. Claim: “Mr. Wright wants to give the County Attorney more funds to prosecute White-collar crime.”
True? Yes, absolutely. I believe investment fraud is at epidemic levels and is harming our economy far more than any form of “economic development” by the government can improve our economy. In 2009, the Utah County Attorney received claims of $104 million in investment fraud. When Commissioner Anderson assumed office in 2007, those claims were less than $20 million annually. Since 2000, the Utah County Attorney has received investment fraud claims totaling $432 million.[16] We need seasoned and experienced investigators and prosecutors to fight this relatively complicated form of crime that has done tremendous damage to our property values, and our community’s ability to remain solvent and self-sufficient. On October 24, 2009, County Attorney Buhman was quoted as follows: "The honest truth is we're barely scratching the surface [on investment fraud]. We could double or triple our department easily, and we would still be extremely busy."[17] However, I am unwilling to raise taxes to increase the resources devoted to investment fraud, but I will find savings from other areas to do so. The very first cut will be $10,000 to the salary of each of the County Commissioners, giving us another $30,000 to fight investment fraud immediately.
4. Claim: “I believe we should be involved in and support Economic Development in Utah County. Mr. Wright does not.”
You have to define “Economic Development.” I believe government does not know better than the private sector how to most effectively allocate resources, and should instead live within its means and do the jobs it is given, namely fight crime and build transportation infrastructure, as effectively as possible. In contrast, Commissioner Anderson has said on multiple occasions that “It is the government’s job to help you get jobs.” Nonetheless, I support the relatively minimal expense for the Economic Development Corporation of Utah to help companies that are already attracted to Utah find the best location for their operations in Utah. Commissioner Anderson claims that 1,027 jobs have come to Utah County in the last 2 years due to his work, even though he offers no evidence that his personal efforts made any difference.
Finally, I make three promises to you that you will be able to verify four years from now, and that Commissioner Anderson is unwilling to make:
1. I will vote against any budget that includes an increase in the property tax rate in the next four years. Our citizens and businesses have to live within their means. It is time for Utah County to do the same.
2. I will vote against any budget that includes the 2008 salary increase from $94,700 to $104,000 for the County Commissioners, and vote against any salary increase for Commissioners in the next 4 years. Everyone is doing more with less. It is time for our Commissioners to lead by example.
3. I will not run for more than two terms as a Utah County Commissioner. Our founding fathers understood the problems with any individual accumulating too much power, and becoming a career politician. I believe no one should serve in any Executive Branch position for more than two terms, and that includes our County Commissioners. In contrast, my opponent is asking you for a fourth term in office.
Thank you very much for engaging with me in an informed discussion of these issues.
I would warmly welcome an opportunity to discuss these issues with you at length. Please join me at any of the meetings below where we will discuss these issues in depth:
1. Saturday, April 10 from 6 PM to 8 PM at the home of Oak Norton in Highland at 10812 North 5800 West.
2. Tuesday, April 13 from 5:30 PM to 9:30 PM at the Cotton Tree Inn in Provo at 2230 North University Parkway. Light refreshments will be provided.
3. Wednesday, April 14 from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM at the home of Karen Herd in Cedar Hills at 10669 Fiddlesticks.
4. Saturday, April 17 from 6:00 PM to 7:30 PM at the home of Kirk & Shannon Magleby at 553 East 100 North in American Fork.
I will also be attending all the mass meetings for county candidates in the next three weeks, which includes events in Santaquin, Lehi, Eagle Mountain, Provo and multiple times in Springville. Please see the complete schedule of all such meetings here:
http://wright4countycommissioner.blogspot.com/2010/04/where-you-can-meet-me-in-person.html
Alternatively, you are always welcome to call me on my cell phone at 801-368-5385.
As always, I also ask for your vote April 24th at the Utah County Convention!
Warm Regards,
Joel Wright
Joel Wright
p.s. If you want further clarification please give me a call. 801-368-5385
p.p.s. Let me know what you think on these issues! I always welcome feedback.
SOURCES
[1] Numbers from 2004 to 2008 available at http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xbutco.pdf , 2009 numbers from http://www.sltrib.com/utahcounty/ci_13862040 (Note that final official expenditures for 2009 are not yet available.)
[2] See http://www.census.gov/
[3] 2007 Lower budget was approved in 2006, but subsequently amended after Commissioner Anderson came into office in 2007, see: http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xbutco.pdf
[4] See the Minutes from the December 18, 2007 Utah County Commission Meeting, Item #26: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/COMMISH/Data/Minutes/CM/2007/121807-CommissionMinutes.pdf
[5] See page 9 of the 2008 Financial Statements from the Independent Auditor here: http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xfutco.pdf
[6] See the Minutes from the June 17, 2008 Commission Meeting, Item #1: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/Commish/data/minutes/CM/2008/061708-CommissionMinutes.pdf ; see also the Deseret News article dated June 18, 2008: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700235619/Utah-County-commissioners-hike-pay.html
[7] See the blog of Daily Herald reporter Joe Pyrah here: http://sausagegrinding.blogspot.com/2009/11/game-on.html
[8] See Item #22 on the August 28, 2007 Commission Minutes at: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/Commish/data/minutes/CM/2007/082807-CommissionMinutes.pdf
[9] See item #17 on the September 23, 2008 Commission Minutes at: http://www.co.utah.ut.us/Dept/Commish/data/minutes/CM/2008/092308-Commission-Minutes.pdf
[10] See page 46 of the 2008 Financial Statements here: http://www.sao.state.ut.us/lgr/county/2008/08xfutco.pdf
[11] Such information not yet available in official Financial Statements, but available on every property tax notice in Utah County. The Utah County Tax Levy was .000809 in 2008, and increased to .000878 in 2009, which is an 8.5% increase.
[12] Copy of the Preliminary Financial Statement (page 3) obtained from Utah County in February 2010 through a GRAMA request. Email Joel Wright at Joel@ElectWright.com if you would like a copy of it.
[13] The Utah Restaurant Association told me that at least 80% of the restaurant tax is paid for by the residents of Utah County, and likely over 90%. I have also had conversations with Commissioners Anderson and White, as well as Rep. Frank who tried to repeal this tax earlier this year, and they all have said to me that approximately 80% of the restaurant tax is paid for by Utah County residents.
[14] See our campaign blog for more details on this proposed change here: http://wright4countycommissioner.blogspot.com/2009/11/should-utah-county-change-its-form-of_18.html
[15] See page 16 of the “5,000 Year Leap” by W. Cleon Skousen.
[16] See: “Investment Fraud Rampant in Utah County” from the Daily Herald, February 28, 2010, available at: http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/article_7c2429f4-a9ed-5ce2-af14-a40ed6c7b8bc.html, or see “Investigators say $59 million scheme targeted Utah County” from Deseret News, October 24, 2009, available at: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705339222/Investigators-say-59-million-scheme-targeted-Utah-County.html?pg=4 ; the number of $432 million from 2000 to 2009 is from an email from the Utah County Bureau of Investigations in our possession that we are happy to share.
[17] See “Investigators say $59 million scheme targeted Utah County” from Deseret News, October 24, 2009, available at: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/705339222/Investigators-say-59-million-scheme-targeted-Utah-County.html?pg=4
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
